The Fail-Safe Formula For Creating A Great Biology Dissertation
It is worth noting that every dissertation will be different to some extent. Therefore, creating a failsafe formula for every single academic paper of this kind can be incredibly difficult. However, if part of your essay involves carrying out experiments and then writing about them, then there are various guidelines that you can follow which can help to almost guarantee the success of your paper.
Using the correct sections
If you are carrying out experiments as part of your work, then you will essentially need to have a results section. In fact, as well as the results section, you will probably need an analysis section, as well as potentially including a methodology section as well.
These particular sections are likely to be included somewhere within the body section of your work. However, towards the beginning of your work, as part of the introduction, you will also need to include some kind of hypothesis. Essentially, the hypothesis will indicate what you expect to happen during the course of your experiments.
Of course, it is worth noting that your hypothesis will not always be correct. However, you should create your hypothesis on the basis of any research that you have done beforehand, including the results of any other experiments other people might have done, as well as any other papers that have been written on the same subject as the topic that you are discussing.
Highlighting anomalies and any mistakes within your experiments
If, having completed any experiments that you wish to use as part of your research, you find that there are mistakes or anomalies, you should not try and cover these up or ignore them. In fact, mistakes and anomalies will happen from time to time, and can actually have some scientific use. For example, anomalies can actually help to highlight what is normal and what is not normal behavior.
For example, if you have a set of similar results, with one of these being highly unusual and different from the rest, then it indicates that the rest of the results are what you would normally expect to see. Furthermore, if as part of your hypothesis you have suggested what results you would expect, and an anomaly does not necessarily follow your hypothesis, then to some extent it can help to confirm that the other results do in fact follow your hypothesis. As a result, it can help to prove that your hypothesis was based on logical reasoning.